UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 26, 2011
MARK LETELL ADAMS
TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE RONALD ALBERTSON, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
The Court is in receipt of a letter from Plaintiff Mark Adams requesting a telephonic conference on or before Friday, October 28, 2011, for 15 the filing of his letter, and that time is of the essence because the subpoenas at issue have a the purpose of resolving a discovery dispute.
Dkt. No. 117. In his letter, Mr. Adams states that the parties met and conferred by telephone prior to production deadline of October 31, 2011. As the parties have not complied with the undersigned's Discovery Standing Order, which requires them to meet and confer in person and thereafter file a 19 joint letter, the request is DENIED. However, given that the dispute remains unresolved, the non- parties need not comply with the production deadline of October 31, 2011. Instead, the parties shall 21 meet and confer, file a joint letter if unable to resolve the dispute, and, if the Court then denies 22 Plaintiff's request to quash the subpoenas, the Court shall set a production deadline.
IT IS SO ORDERED
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.