UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 26, 2011
NAIDU SIMADRI AND NAIDU ASHIKA, HUSBAND AND WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS
EXPRESS CAPITAL LENDING A BUSINESS ENTITY, FORM UNKNOWN; UNKNOWN MORTGAGE BROKER, A BUSINIESS ENTITY, FORM UNKNOWN; INVESTOR TITLE COMPANY, A BUSINESS ENTITY, FORM UNKNOWN; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC, A BUSINIESS ENTITY, FORM UNKNOWN, AND DOES 1-10 INCLUSIVE
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable VIRGINIA A. Phillips, U.S. District Judge
CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL
PRESENT: HONORABLE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Marva Dillard Courtroom Deputy None Present Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
NO APPEARANCE NO APPEARANCE PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than November 15, 2011, why this should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, or before the above date:
! Proof of service of summons and complaint. ! Answer by the defendant(s) or plaintiff's request for entry of default. ! Plaintiff's filing of an application to the clerk to enter default judgment or filing of a noticed motion for entry of default judgment.
In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7- oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.