IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 26, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender RACHEL W. HILL, Bar #151522 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service 2300 Tulare Street, Suite 330 Fresno, California 93721-2226 Telephone: (559) 487-5561 Attorney for Defendant JUAN SOLORIO-MENDOZA
Date December 5, 2011 Time: 1:00 P.M.
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS
CONFERENCE HEARING; ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the status conference in the above-entitled matter scheduled for October 28, 2011, may be continued to December 5, 2011, at 1:00 P.M.
This continuance is made at the request of defense counsel. The defense is seeking additional discovery from the government. The government will seek to see if the requested discovery exists. The government has provided the defense with a plea offer, but counsel is unable to determine the relative merits of the offer until she receives the requested discovery, which she believes does exist. AUSA Henry Carbajal has no objection to this request. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for both counsel and the court.
The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded because the ends of justice served by continuing this case outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial in that additional time is necessary for effective defense preparation. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).
Good Cause exists. Time is excluded for the reasons stated. At the next hearing, either a change of please will occur or counsel should be ready to set the trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.