Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dawn Till and Mary Josephs v. Saks Incorporated

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 28, 2011

DAWN TILL AND MARY JOSEPHS,
INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
SAKS INCORPORATED, A TENNESSEE CORPORATION; SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, INC., A MASSACHUSETTS CORPORATION; SAKS &
COMPANY, A NEW YORK CORPORATION; AND SAKS FIFTH AVENUE OFF FIFTH, ,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong Judge of the United States District Court

Assigned to: Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong

[Complaint filed: February 2, 2011]

[FAC filed: March 8, 2011]

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DENY CLASS CERTIFICATION AND REJECT CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among Plaintiffs Dawn Till and Mary Josephs ("Plaintiffs") through their counsel, and Defendant Saks Incorporated, Saks & Company, and Saks Fifth Avenue, Inc., ("Saks") through their counsel, (collectively, the "Parties") to the following pursuant to Civil L.Rs. 6-2 and 7-12:

1. On September 28, 2011 Saks filed its Motion to Deny Class Certification and Reject Conditional Certification (the "Motion"). The hearing on the Motion was set by the Court for February 28, 2012.

2. The Parties have met and conferred, and have agreed to the following briefing schedule for the Motion: Plaintiffs must file and serve any opposition papers to Saks' Motion on or before November 25, 2011 and Saks must file any reply papers on or before December 21, 2011.

This is the first request to modify the briefing schedule on Saks' Motion.

4. The Parties reserve the right to seek Court approval for further modification to the briefing or to make other applications to the Court regarding the hearing date and/or briefing schedule in connection with the Motion.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: OCTOBER 12, 2011 HOFFMAN & LAZEAR By: /s/Chad A. Saunders Chad A. Saunders ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS DATED: OCTOBER 12, 2011 Sidley Austin LLP By: /s/Jennifer B. Zargarof Jennifer B. Zargarof ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20111028

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.