Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America, State of v. Cvs Caremark Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


October 28, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF HAWAII,
STATE OF NEVADA EX REL.
HAROON AND AZIZ, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION,
LONGS DRUG STORES CORPORATION, AND DOES 1 - 10,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

JOINT STIPULATION [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Relator Haroon Aziz and named Defendants CVS Caremark Corporation and Longs Drug Stores Corporation (collectively "Defendants" or "CVS"), by and through their respective 20 counsel, hereby STIPULATE: 21

1. In a case management conference held on September 9, 2011, this Court scheduled 22 argument on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for November 4, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. 23 2. Catherine M. O'Neil, counsel for Defendants, has been scheduled to appear in a 24 zoning hearing on the evening of November 3, 2011, which now makes travel from Georgia to 25 California in time for the November 4, 2011 hearing very difficult. 26 3. Further, Defendants have just substituted counsel in this matter, due to the departure 27 of Ross W. Nadel from King & Spalding. New counsel, Geoffrey M. Ezgar, is scheduled to be 28 in New York on November 4, 2011.

4. In light of these conflicts, Defendants respectfully request that the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss be rescheduled. 3 5. The parties propose that the hearing be rescheduled for November 18, 2011 at 10:00 4 a.m. 5 6

DATED: October 28, 2011 /s/ Michael A. Hirst Michael A. Hirst, Esq. 2 7 Hirst Law Group, P.C. 8 Counsel for Relator Haroon Aziz /s/ Catherine M. O'Neil 9 10 Catherine M. O'Neil, Esq. (Appearance Pro Hac Vice) King & Spalding LLP Counsel for Defendants

DECLARATION OF CONSENT

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X (B) regarding signatures, I attest under

16 penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from 17

Michael A. Hirst. 18

/s/ Catherine M. O'Neil

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, that the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is rescheduled for November 18, 2011 at 10:00 a.m.

DATED: October ____, 2011

November 1

UNITED STATES DISTRCT JUDGE Charles R. Breyer Judge

20111028

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.