The opinion of the court was delivered by: George H. Wu, U. S. District Judge
Social Security No. 4 5 0 2 (Last 4 digits)
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 10 27 2011
David A. Elden, Appointed
U GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of:
21 U.S.C. § 846: CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES as charged in the First Superseding Indictment.
The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of: Thirty-six (36) Months.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, which is due immediately. Pursuant to Guideline Section 5E1.2(a), all fines are waived as the Court finds that the defendant has established that he is unable to pay and is not likely to become able to pay any fine.
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Andres Chaidez Chaidez, is hereby committed on Count One of the First Superseding Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of 36 months.
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of 5 years under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;
The defendant shall participate in mental health treatment, which may include evaluation and counseling, until discharged from the treatment by the treatment provider, with the approval of the Probation Officer;
As directed by the Probation Officer, the defendant shall pay all or part of the costs of treating the defendant's mental health treatment to the aftercare contractor during the period of community supervision, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3672. The defendant shall provide payment and proof of payment as directed by the Probation Officer;
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
The defendant shall not commit any violation of local, state or federal law or ordinance; and The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
The Court authorizes the Probation Officer to disclose the Presentence Report, and/or any previous mental health evaluations or reports, to the treatment provider. The treatment provider may provide information (excluding the Presentence Report), to State or local social service agencies (such as the State of California, Department of Social Services), for the purpose of the client's rehabilitation.
The Government's request to dismiss the First Superseding Indictment and the remaining ...