Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Brenda Hill, et al v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


October 31, 2011

BRENDA HILL, ET AL.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Richard Seeborg United States District Judge

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO EXTEND FILING DEADLINE FOR OPPOSITION BRIEF

Explaining that they were unaware of the recent amendment to Civil Local Rule 7 that requires briefing schedules to be calculated from the motion filing date rather than the noticed 17 hearing date, plaintiffs seek leave to submit their opposition to the pending motion to dismiss on or 18 before November 10, 2011, the date that it would have been due under the former version of the 19 rule. Counsel have a duty to implement office management procedures to ensure that their 20 knowledge of the rules remains current at all times. Nevertheless, in light of the interest in deciding 21 issues on the merits, and the lack of any cognizable prejudice to defendants, the request is granted, 22 and the deadline for opposition is extended to November 10, 2011. Any reply shall be filed on or 23 before November 17, 2011

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20111031

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.