Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

John Armstrong, et al v. Edmund G. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 1, 2011

JOHN ARMSTRONG, ET AL.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.*FN1

ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY'S FEES FOR THE FIRST TWO QUARTERS OF 2011 AT 2011 RATES

provided Defendants with their 2011 hourly rates. Since service of the first quarterly 3 statement, the parties have met and conferred over the reasonable rate for 2011 work. A 4 motion to compel Plaintiffs' 2011 rates is currently due to be filed with the Court on November 18, 2011. The parties have now agreed upon Plaintiffs' 2011 rates. Pursuant to 6 this agreement, Defendants are ordered to pay the following principal amounts, plus 7 interest for the undisputed 2011 hours:

On April 26, 2011, Plaintiffs served their first quarterly statement of the year and

* $55,091.50 for fees incurred the First Quarter of 2011, for monitoring and fee collection activities in the California Department of Corrections of Rehabilitation Division of Adult Operations and Adult Programs (CDCR AOAP), Board of Parole Hearings (BPH), and Division of Adult Parole Operations (DAPO) portions of the case. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are charts setting forth the fees payable to Plaintiffs for the difference between the amounts previously ordered at 2010 rates and their 2011 rates for these hours.

* $5,535.00 for fees incurred the First Quarter of 2011, at 2011 rates, for hours ordered at 2010 rates in connection with the Motion to Compel 2010 rates.

Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a chart setting forth the difference between the amount previously ordered to be paid for this portion of the work at 2010 rates and the amount owed at 2011 rates.

* $74,380.90 for fees incurred during the Second Quarter of 2011, for monitoring and fee collection activities in the California Department of Corrections of Rehabilitation Division of Adult Operations and Adult Programs (CDCR AOAP), Board of Parole Hearings (BPH), and Division of Adult Parole Operations (DAPO) portions of the case. Attached hereto as Exhibit C are charts setting forth the fees payable to Plaintiffs for the difference between the amounts previously ordered at 2010 rates and their 2011 rates for these hours.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the amounts set forth above are due and collectable as of forty-five days from the date of entry of this Order. Interest on these fees 3 and costs will continue to run from the dates set forth in the chart attached as Exhibit D 4 hereto, accruing at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961 (also shown on Exhibit D).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

APPROVED AS TO FORM: 13

Jay C. Russell DATED: October 31, 2011 14 Jay C. Russell 15 Deputy Attorney General Attorney for Defendants 16 17 DATED: October 31, 2011 Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld 19 Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.