Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Berry Lynn Adams v. Daniel L. Kraft

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


November 1, 2011

BERRY LYNN ADAMS,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
DANIEL L. KRAFT, A STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARK RANGER, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

ORDER (re: dkt #164)

It is not clear to the Court whether Defendants' counsel was aware of the Court's October 27, 2011 Order granting Plaintiff's Request for an Order Postponing the Trial Date and setting a 18 new pretrial conference and trial schedule when Defendants' counsel filed the Statement of Non-19 opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Postpone the Trial Date on October 28, 2011. Defendants shall 20 file by November 4, 2011 a statement as to whether they oppose the December 20, 2011 pretrial 21 conference and January 3, 2012 trial dates and if so, the reasons for the opposition. The Court 22 rarely ever continues a trial and is set on having this trial as soon as possible. 23

At the summary judgment hearing, Defendants were unwilling to participate in any 24 alternative dispute resolution. In Defendants' November 4, 2011 filing, they should indicate if that 25 is still their position. 26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20111101

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.