UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 1, 2011
M.U.S.A., INC., ET AL.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable A. Howard Matz, U.S. District Judge
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Present: The Honorable A. HOWARD MATZ, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Stephen Montes Not Reported
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys NOT Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys NOT Present for Defendants:
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS (No Proceedings Held)
On October 18, 2011, the Court ordered Plaintiff Nachum to show cause, no later than October 25, 2011, why this case should not be dismissed as to Defendant Benmar Services Inc. and as to Defendant M. USA Inc. for lack of prosecution. Docket No. 23. The Court noted that the file in this case lacks proof of service with regards to these defendants.
Plaintiff Nachum has failed to respond to the Court's order. "The failure to file any required paper, or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or denial of the motion." Local Rule 7--12. Accordingly the Court hereby DISMISSES this action as to Defendant Benmar Services Inc. and as to Defendant M. USA Inc. pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and failure to obey an order of this Court.
Initials of Preparer SMO
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.