Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Martin Salcido v. Conrad and Rice

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 1, 2011

MARTIN SALCIDO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CONRAD AND RICE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On October 20, 2011, defendant Conrad was directed to show cause, within twenty-one days, why default should not be entered. On November 1, 2011, counsel entered a notice of appearance on behalf of defendant Conrad, and defendant Conrad filed a response to the court's order to show cause. Defendant provided a declaration as to his inadvertent failure to timely file a responsive pleading, as well as to the facts underlying his defense to plaintiff's claims. Accordingly, the order to show cause is discharged, and defendant Conrad is directed to file a responsive pleading.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The October 20, 2011 order to show cause (dkt. no. 18) is discharged; and

2. Defendant Conrad shall file a responsive pleading within twenty-one days from the date of this order.

salc0611.oscr

20111101

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.