Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Jonathan Dracup

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO)


November 3, 2011

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
JONATHAN DRACUP, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Samuel Conti Judge

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Date: November 18, 2011 Time: 10:00 a.m.

Court: Hon. Samuel Conti

PLAINTIFF Adobe Systems Incorporated ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Jonathan Dracup, an 25 individual and d/b/a www.buycheapsoftware.com; Buy Cheap Software, Inc.; and Softman 26 Products, LLC a/k/a Softman Products Company, LLC (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS Plaintiff filed its complaint on or about August 8, 2011;

WHEREAS Plaintiff is to serve Defendants on or before December 6, 2011;

WHEREAS Defendants' counsel has agreed to accept service for Defendants;

WHEREAS Plaintiff mailed a waiver of service to Defendants on or about October 25, 2011;

WHEREAS Defendants have not yet returned the waiver of service and have until November 24, 2011, to do so;

WHEREAS, upon return of the waiver of service within the prescribed timeframe, Defendants shall have until December 24, 2011, to respond to the Complaint;

WHEREAS Defendants have not yet filed a response to the Complaint;

WHEREAS the Parties are attempting to resolve the claims alleged in the Complaint without further intervention of the Court;

WHEREAS continuing the Case Management Conference until after Defendants have been served and have had a chance to respond to the Complaint would be the most efficient use of the Court's time and resources;

WHEREAS continuing the Case Management Conference and all corresponding deadlines will provide the Parties with additional time to engage in discussions to resolve this matter; and

February 24, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. 11/3

IT IS SO ORDERED

PROOF OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, certify and declare that I am over the age of 18 years, employed in the County of Los Angeles, and not a party to the above-entitled cause. I am employed by a member of the Bar of the United States District Court of California. My business address is 517 East Wilson Avenue, Suite 202, Glendale, California 91206.

On November 2, 2011, I served the: x STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER for the following civil action:

Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Dracup, et al. on the following interested parties in this action: George A. Shohet Law Offices of George A. Shohet 245 Main Street, Suite 310 Venice, CA 90291 by placing a true and correct copy thereof in an envelope to be immediately sealed thereafter. I am readily familiar with the office's practice of collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the United States Postal Service on the same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Glendale, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service may be presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or postage meter is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

Place of Mailing: Glendale, California.

Executed on November 2, 2011, at Glendale, California.

Nicole L. Drey

Nicole L. Drey

20111103

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.