UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
November 3, 2011
CHEVRON PRODUCTS CO., INC.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER RE: PROPOSED JUDGMENT
On September 2, 2010, the Court entered its Order re Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, in which the Court granted Defendant Chevron U.S.A. Inc.'s motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff Richard A. Duste's claims for negligence, intentional interference with contractual relations, negligent interference with contractual relations, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, libel, breach of contract, and violation
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer by November 15, 2011, and of California Business & Professions Code section 17200, et seq.. Dkt. No. 36. On October 7, 15 2011, a jury returned a verdict on October 7, 2011 after trial in favor of Plaintiff and against D 16 Defendant on Plaintiff's claim for slander. Dkt. No. 81.
18 thereafter file a joint proposed judgment. If one party wishes to include a term to which the other 19 party objects, the term shall be marked as "disputed" and included within the proposed judgment, in 20 the place where the party proposing the term believes it should be included. If there are any terms 21 on which the parties disagree as to form and/or content, both parties' proposed terms shall be 22 included in one section marked as "disputed." Argument and authority for and against each disputed 23 term shall be filed as a separate joint document. The parties shall ensure that the proposed judgment 24 is submitted as a Word or WordPerfect document via email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.