The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER ON PARTIES' STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER (Docket Nos. 38, 39)
On October 28, 2011, the parties filed an amended stipulation and proposed order to modify the scheduling order. (Docs. 38, 39.) The Court finds there is good cause to approve the modifications requested, but is unable to accommodate some of the proposed dates and therefore revises the dates as necessary.
Specifically the proposed dates for the dispositive motion filing deadline and hearing do not comply with the notice requirements of Rule 230 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The proposed dates fail to provide sufficient time for the filing of oppositions and for the Court to consider the motions. Further, changing the dispositive motion hearing date necessitates changing the pretrial conference and trial dates.
Therefore, the schedule deadlines are revised as follows: Deadline Current Deadline Revised Deadline
1. Non-Expert Discovery August 15, 2011 December 5, 2011
2. Expert Disclosure August 30, 2011 December 20, 2011
3. Supp. Exp. Discl. September 30, 2011 January 19, 2012
4. Exp. Discovery October 15, 2011 February 3, 2012
5. Non-Disp. Filing Deadline November 10, 2011 February 8, 2012
6. Non-Disp. Motion Hearing December 14, 2011 March 14, 2012
7. Disp. Mot. Filing Deadline November 23, 2011 February 22, 2012
8. Disp. Motion Hearing December 12, 2011 April 4, 2012
9. Settlement Conference January 3, 2012 April 3, 2012
10. Pretrial Conference January 23, 2012 ...