Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. David Forkner and Loretta Canham

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 3, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
DAVID FORKNER AND LORETTA CANHAM,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

John R. Manning Attorney at Law Ca. St. Bar No. 220874 1111 H Street, Suite 204 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 444-3994 Attorney for Defendant David Robbie Forkner

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

Date: January 20, 2012 Time: 9:00 a.m.

IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Michael M. Beckwith, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant David Forkner, John R. Manning Esq., and counsel for defendant Loretta Leigh Canham, Dennis S. Waks Esq., that the status conference currently set for November 4, 2011, be continued to January 20, 2012, and stipulate that the time beginning November 3, 2011, and extending through January 20, 2012, should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties request to exclude time for defense preparation. This matter involves a wire intercept on several telephones and related pen registers, as well as over 3000 pages of discovery.

The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 USC § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and (Local T-4).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. David Forkner and Loretta Canham, Defendants.

Case No. CR.S 08-363 GEB

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Based on these findings and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Time is excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced beginning from the date of the stipulation, November 3, 2011, through and including January 20, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare] and Local Code T4. It is further ordered that the November 4, 2011 status conference shall be continued until January 20, 2012, at 9:00a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

20111103

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.