Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

People of the State of California, Ex Rel., et al v. Federal Housing Finance Agency

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division


November 4, 2011

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EX REL., ET AL.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, DEFENDANTS.
v.
COUNTY OF SONOMA, ET AL., ET AL.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.
SIERRA CLUB,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.
CITY OF PALM DESERT,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Laurel Beeler United States Magistrate Judge

(Related Case) (Related Case) (Related Case)

NOTICE OF REFERRAL AND COURT ORDER RE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES

NOTICE OF REFERRAL TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

The district court has referred all discovery to United States Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. ECF No. 145 at 3. The parties have indicated that they have a discovery dispute. Docket No. 4:10-cv-03270-CW, ECF Nos. 157 and 159. The Court directs the parties to comply with the procedures for addressing discovery disputes set 12 forth in Judge Beeler's standing order (attached).

Those procedures require, among other things, that if a meet-and-confer by other means does not resolve the parties' dispute, lead counsel for the parties must meet and confer in person. If that procedure does not resolve the disagreement, the parties must file a joint letter instead of a formal motion. Given the nature of the dispute, the Court D modifies its standing order to allow the parties to file a joint letter of no more than 10 single-spaced pages, with legal argument equally divided.

The parties also should include copies of all cited legal S authorities. After reviewing the joint letter, the Court will evaluate whether further proceedings are necessary, including any further briefing or argument.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20111104

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.