Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Herman Pearl Company, et al v. Global Freight Services

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 7, 2011

HERMAN PEARL COMPANY, ET AL., PLAINTIFF,
v.
GLOBAL FREIGHT SERVICES, LLC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Carolyn K. Delaney United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Defendant and cross claimant D & P Enterprises, Inc. filed motions for default judgment. In the cross complaint, plaintiff alleges claims for fraud, conversion and indemnity arising out of the sale to cross claimant by cross defendants of allegedly stolen merchandise. The motions for default judgment are defective in that they were not properly noticed for hearing, are not accompanied by a memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion, and the affidavit relied on by cross claimant does not establish that cross claimant is entitled to the relief requested. See, e.g., Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. v. Lan Franco, 267 Cal. App. 2d 881 (1968) (right to non-contractual implied indemnity rests upon equitable considerations). Here, no judgment has been taken against cross claimant and the affidavit of Amy Johnson (dkt. no. 22-5) is insufficient to support entry of default judgment against cross defendants.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that cross claimant's motions for default judgment (dkt. no. 28, 30, 32) are denied without prejudice.

hermanpearl.def

20111107

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.