IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 7, 2011
ROBERT CHRISTOPHER JIMENEZ, PLAINTIFF,
J. WHITFIELD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff is proceeding without counsel. On August 25, 2011, defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. In the amended complaint, plaintiff refers to various exhibits which were not appended to the amended complaint*fn1 or to his original complaint. Plaintiff separately filed exhibits on February 23, 2010, and September 28, 2010, but the exhibits provided are not marked with specific exhibit letters to coincide with their reference in the amended complaint, and plaintiff did not provide all of the exhibits referred to in the amended complaint.*fn2 As one example, plaintiff states that "on Oct. 17, 2006 plaintiff in exhibit (C1 - C2) places plaintiff at 1033 or so at a hearing and was not at his cell." (Dkt. No. 9 at 2, Claim One.) The exhibits provided by plaintiff do not contain a rules violation report dated October 17, 2006, or other document indicating plaintiff was at a hearing on October 17, 2006, or any exhibits marked C1 or C2. Plaintiff will be provided an opportunity to submit all the exhibits he referenced in the amended complaint, clearly marked with the appropriate exhibit letter plaintiff used in the amended complaint. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to provide the exhibits referenced will preclude their use in resolving the pending motion.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Within fourteen days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file a set of exhibits marked with the respective exhibit letter to coincide with plaintiff's reference in plaintiff's amended complaint.
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of his amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 9.)