The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Edward J. Davila United States District Judge
NATHAN BENJAMIN, SB No. 197859 firstname.lastname@example.org 2 CALEB SEQUOIA BASKIN, SB No. 226132 email@example.com 3 BASKIN & GRANT, LLP 331 SOQUEL AVENUE, SUITE 100 4 SANTA CRUZ, CALIFORNIA 95062 Tel: (831) 425-8999 5 Fax: (831) 425-8853 6 THE LAW OFFICE OF SIMMONS & PURDY PAMELA D. SIMMONS, SBN 160523 7 firstname.lastname@example.org 2425 PORTER STREET, SUITE 10 8 SOQUEL, CALIFORNIA, 95073-2454 Tel: (831) 464-6884 9 Fax: (831) 464-6886 10 Attorneys for Larry Busch and Karen Busch, Plaintiffs 11 12
STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS LITTON LOAN SERVICING LP AND MTGLQ INVESTORS, LP
Plaintiffs Larry Busch and Karen Bush and defendants Litton Loan Servicing LP ("Litton") and MTGLQ Investors, LP ("MTGLQ"), through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows:
1. Plaintiffs obtained a loan secured by real property at 587 Twin Pines Drive, Scotts Valley, California ("Property") in April 2007 ("Loan"). Plaintiff's lender was Residential Mortgage Capital. A deed of trust securing the Loan was recorded in the Official Records of Santa Cruz County on April 19, 2007.
2. Effective October 30, 2010, Litton began servicing the Loan. Litton acquired the 4 servicing rights from Citimortgage, Inc.
3. Effective December 1, 2010, Litton transferred the servicing of the loan to American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.
4. Effective October 25, 2010, the Deed of Trust securing the Loan was assigned to MTGLQ. An Assignment of Deed of Trust reflecting this transfer, dated October 25, 2010, was 9 recorded in the Official Records of Santa Cruz County on November 10, 2010.
5. Effective November 12, 2010, MTGLQ assigned the Deed of Trust securing the Loan to Resi Whole Loan IV, LLC. An Assignment of Deed of Trust reflecting this transfer, dated November 12, 2010, was recorded in the Official Records of Santa Cruz County on March 30, 2011.
6. Litton and MTGLQ filed a Motion to Dismiss, and by Stipulation Ordered on October 17, 2011, the Court set the matter to be heard on December 2, 2011, with Opposition to be 16 filed on or before November 16, 2011, and Reply to be filed on or before November 23, 2011. 17
7. The parties to this Stipulation have met and conferred and have determined that in 18 the interest of economy Litton and MTGLQ should be dismissed form the case, without prejudice, 19 such that the litigation can move forward among the other parties and if in the course of discovery Plaintiffs determine there to be a valid reason for Litton and MTGLQ to be back in the case Plaintiffs will be free to motion the Court to amend and re-name Litton and MTGLQ. 22
8. Plaintiffs hereby request that following entry of dismissal, without prejudice, the 23 case be set for Case Management at the Court's convenience.
Based on the above Recitals, the parties agree and ...