The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Now before the Court is Plaintiff Orange County Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Trust Fund's (the "Trust Fund"), Local Union No. 441 of the International Brotherhood of 20 Electrical Workers', and Douglas Chappell's, as trustee of the Trust Fund, (collectively 21 "Plaintiffs") unopposed motion for default judgment against Defendant Moore Electrical 22 Contracting, Inc. ("Defendant"). ECF No. 22. The Court finds this matter suitable for decision 23 without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7--1(b). Accordingly, the hearing on the motion, set for 24 November 17, 2011, is hereby VACATED. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES 25 without prejudice Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment. Plaintiffs may submit a revised motion 26 for default judgment within 30 days of this Order.
Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit on March 1, 2011. The Court granted Defendant's former 28 counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel on July 20, 2011, on the grounds that Defendant's ongoing liquidation frustrated the attorney client relationship. ECF No. 17, at 2. The Court also 2 authorized Plaintiffs to move for entry of default within 14 days, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-3 9(b), if Defendant failed to obtain new counsel within 30 days. Id. at 4. Defendant failed to obtain 4 counsel, and, accordingly, the Clerk entered Default on October 4, 2011. ECF No. 20. Plaintiffs 5 filed the instant motion for default judgment on October 7, 2011.
contributions, liquidated damages, and interest, and $14,897.33 in attorney's fees and costs. Mot. 8 Plaintiffs allege that Defendant is an employer within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. §§ 1002(5), 1145, and an employer in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of section 301 of the LMRA, 29 U.S.C. § 185. Plaintiffs also allege that Defendant bound itself to the Inside Wireman's Agreement between the Orange County Chapter of the National Electrical Contractors Association 13 ("NECA") and IBEW Local 441 when Defendant signed a Letter of Assent on November 16, 1982. 14 Inc. ("Quail Decl.") Ex. A, at 1.
Plaintiffs claim that the Inside Wireman's Agreement obligated 16 Defendant failed to make its required contributions from October 2010 through April 2011. Mot. 18 Although Plaintiffs have attached the Inside Wireman's Agreement that purportedly 20 required Defendant to make contributions to the Trust Fund, the agreement is not signed. See 21 Quail Decl. Ex. B. In the absence of a signed Inside Wireman's Agreement, the Court will not 22 presume that it is indeed binding on Defendant or that Defendant was obligated to pay the sums 23 claimed in Plaintiffs' motion. In a revised motion, Plaintiffs must attach a signed Inside 24 In addition to seeking unpaid contributions to the Trust Fund, Plaintiffs seek unpaid 26 contributions to the following funds: National Electrical Benefit Fund; Orange County IBEW -- 27 Fund; Orange County Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Trust Fund; Orange County Plaintiffs seek a total judgment of $148,736.53, comprising $133,839.2 in total outstanding 4.
See Decl. of Chloe Quail in Support of Mot. for Default J. Against Def. Moore Elec. Contracting, Defendant to make benefit contributions to the Trust Fund, Quail Decl.Ex. B, at 21-25, and that 4.
NECA Electrical Workers Defined Contribution Plan; National Electrical Industry Fund, Vacation IBEW -- NECA Labor Management Cooperative Trust; National Labor Management Cooperation 2
Fund; IBEW Local Union #441 Dues Deduction; IBEW Education Fund, Electrical Industry 3
Furthermore, the Court notes that Douglas Chappell is only named as Plaintiff on the grounds that 5 he is a trustee of the Health and Welfare Trust Fund, and there is no evidence that Mr. Chappell has 6 a relationship with the non-plaintiff recipients of fringe benefits contributions. The Court will not 7 assume, in the absence of any cited authority, that Plaintiffs are entitled to recover damages for 8 unpaid contributions that are owed to non-plaintiff trust funds. In a revised motion, Plaintiffs must 9 cite binding authority supporting their position that they are entitled to collect contributions owed 10 to non-plaintiff trust funds. Failure to do so may result in only a partial award.
Decl."), and Plaintiffs' interest calculations,Stephenson Decl. ¶¶ 3-9, and finds that Plaintiffs' 14 interest calculations are incomplete. Plaintiffs state that on or about August 1, 2011, Plaintiffs 15 recovered $50,733.26 from Defendant, which amount was applied to Defendant's delinquency. 16
Stephenson Decl. ¶ 11. However, the interest calculations do not appear to consider that this 17 payment would have paid off a portion of the principal owed, thereby curtailing the accrual of 18 interest for at least a portion of the unpaid contributions. In a revised motion, Plaintiffs must take 19 into account the August 1, 2011 payment in their interest calculations. 20
21 the same day that a monthly contribution became delinquent, as Plaintiffs appeared to suggest in 22 their interest calculations. See Stephenson Decl. ¶¶ 3-9. The Stephenson Declaration states that 23
"[t]he Trusts also require that contributions to the Trusts are delinquent if not paid by the 16th day 24 of the calendar month following the payroll month. The Trusts also require that if contributions are 25 more than thirty days late, ...