Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Kevin Marshall Agrava

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 15, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
KEVIN MARSHALL AGRAVA,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender ERIC V. KERSTEN, Bar #226429 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service 2300 Tulare Street, Suite 330 Fresno, California 93721-2226 Telephone: (559) 487-5561 Attorney for Defendant Kevin Marshall Agrava

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND ORDER Date: November 28, 2011 Time: 1:00 p.m.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, BRIAN ENOS, Assistant United States Attorney, and ERIC V. KERSTEN, Assistant Federal Defender, counsel for defendant, Kevin Marshall Agrava, that the date for status conference may be continued to November 28, 2011, or the soonest date thereafter that is convenient to the court. The date currently set for status conference is November 21, 2011, at 1:00 p.m. The requested new date is November 28, 2011, at 1:00 p.m.

The upcoming status conference was originally scheduled for Friday, November 18, 2011. The matter was moved to November 21, 2011 when the court's law and motion calendar was changed from Mondays to Fridays. Defense counsel hopes to be out of the office on November 21, 2011. A short continuance is requested to allow for continuity of counsel.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded as necessary for continuity of counsel, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). For this reason, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

ORDER Good cause stated. The intervening period of delay is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

b9ed48

Agrava: Stipulation to Continue Status Conference

20111115

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.