Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Boris Murzak, et al v. Greenpoint Mortgage

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 17, 2011

BORIS MURZAK, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the court may dismiss an action where service of summons is not made within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. In the order requiring timely service filed July 25, 2011, plaintiff was cautioned that this action may be dismissed if service was not timely completed. This action was filed May 24, 2011 in state court and removed to this court on July 25, 2011, and plaintiff has not yet served defendants Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., Marin Conveyancing Corporation, and Residential Funding Company, LLC with summons. Although plaintiff entered into a stipulation of dismissal with defendants Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger to BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP; Recontrust Company; and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., that stipulation dismissed only those defendants and not the entire action.

As a result, by order of September 30, 2011, the action was re-opened, and plaintiff was directed to show cause for his failure to serve defendants Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., Marin Conveyancing Corporation, and Residential Funding Company, LLC in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Plaintiff has not responded to that order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:

1. Defendants Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., Marin Conveyancing Corporation, and Residential Funding Company, LLC be dismissed; and

2. This action be closed.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within fourteen (14) days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

20111117

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.