UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 18, 2011
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Sheri Pym, United States Magistrate Judge
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Present: The Honorable Sheri Pym, United States Magistrate Judge
Kimberly Carter None Appearing
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):
None Appearing None Appearing Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
On May 27, 2011, plaintiff Hector Ramos filed a Complaint for Review of Social Security Decision. On May 31, 2011, this court issued a case management order directing that plaintiff file a document entitled "Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Complaint" ("Memorandum") within 30 days after service of defendant's responsive pleading. On October 12, 2011, defendant served on plaintiff its answer. As such, plaintiff's Memorandum was due on or before November 11, 2011. The court has received no such Memorandum, nor any other communication from plaintiff.
Accordingly, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, by December 9, 2011, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a court order. If plaintiff
his Memorandum on or by December 9, 2011, he need not separately respond to Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff is cautioned that his failure to timely file a response this Order to Show Cause will be deemed by the Court as consent to the dismissal of action without prejudice.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.