Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Jesus Ramon Avilez

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 18, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
JESUS RAMON AVILEZ,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender JEREMY S. KROGER, Bar #258956 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service 2300 Tulare Street, Suite 330 Fresno, California 93721-2226 Telephone: (559) 487-5561 Attorney for Defendant Jesus Ramon Avilez

Date: January 23, 2012 Time: 1:00 P.m.

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND ORDER THEREON

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, LAUREL MONTOYA, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for Plaintiff, and JEREMY S. KROGER, Assistant Federal Defender and counsel for Defendant Jesus Ramon Avilez, that the date for status conference in this matter may be continued to January 23, 2012, at 1:00 p.m., or the soonest date thereafter that is convenient to the court. The date currently set for status conference is December 21, 2011. The requested new date is January 23, 2012.

This continuance is requested for further negotiation between the parties, as well as defense investigation and preparation.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded as necessary for further plea negotiations and effective defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A). For this reason, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

ORDER

The stipulation is incorrect, in that the currently set Status Conference is NOVEMBER 21, and not December 21. The good cause provided the Court constitutes good cause. The intervening period of delay is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20111118

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.