IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN DIVISION
November 21, 2011
LOURDES LOPEZ, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND FAIR HOUSING FOUNDATION, A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS,
CADIGAN COMMUNITIES, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; D/B/A MONTEREY PINES APARTMENTS; GREENWOOD AND SON, LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, D/B/A GREENWOOD & MCKENZIE, DEFENDANT
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Alicia G. Rosenberg United States Magistrate Judge
[Related to Fair Housing Council of Orange County, Inc., et al. v. Cadigan Communities L.P., et al. Case No.: CV11-00488 AG (AGRx)]
Assigned to Dept. 10D
The Hon. Andrew J. Guilford
Action Commenced: July 25, 2011 Trial Date: Not Set Discovery Cut-Off: Not Set Law & Motion Cut-Off: Not Set
The parties having entered into a Stipulation for the entry of a Protective Order to govern the disclosure, dissemination, and use of "Confidential Information" produced by the parties in this action, and the Court having reviewed the Stipulation and finding good cause for the entry of such an order, hereby orders that the following Protective Order ("the Order") shall apply to any information designated as "Confidential" pursuant to agreement of the parties or order of the Court.
1. Confidential Information
Plaintiff FHF contends that information regarding the investigative techniques employed by FHF staff and information relating to any investigation carried out by the FHF is confidential and the public disclosure of such information would jeopardize ongoing and future testing of other property owners' practices in Los Angeles County and would tax the limited resources of the FHF by requiring them to continually find and employ new anonymous testers and new investigative techniques. Therefore, Plaintiff FHF seeks to keep documents related to its testers and investigative techniques as confidential. See Shammouh v. Karp, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16334 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 5, 1996) (holding good cause exists to treat information regarding the identities of testers and investigative techniques as confidential).
Any documents or things produced in discovery that contain or reveal Confidential Information or that are designated as Confidential Information under the terms of the Order, and all copies, recordings, abstracts, excerpts, analyses, court filings, or other writings that contain, reflect, reveal, suggest, or otherwise disclose such Confidential Information shall be deemed to be Confidential Information.
The provisions of the Order shall not apply to information which can be shown by competent evidence to be: i) in the public domain at the time of disclosure or, through no fault of the Receiving Party, in the public domain after the time of disclosure; ii) known to or developed by the Receiving Party prior to the time of disclosure; or iii) obtained from a third party having no obligation to protect such information from disclosure.
A "Disclosing Party" is the party who produces or discloses Confidential Information, or on whose behalf such information is disclosed, to a receiving party's attorneys. A "Receiving Party" is any party (either Plaintiff or a defendant) that receives or is permitted to receive Confidential Information from the Disclosing Party under the Order.
3. Service Bureau
A Service Bureau is a person, agency, or organization engaged by counsel or any party to perform clerical document handling, stenographic, computer data entry, or other services in support of litigation, whose participation is reasonably necessary for the litigation, who has received a fully executed copy of the Order, and whose owner or legal representative has executed an agreement to be bound by the terms of the Order.
4. Limited Use
Confidential Information disclosed by a Disclosing Party under the Order shall be used by the Receiving Party only for purposes of this litigation and not for any business, commercial, scientific, competitive, or other purpose whatsoever.
a. Confidential Information may be designated by a Disclosing Party as "Confidential" by marking it as "Confidential" or by designating the information as "Confidential" by any separate writing sufficient to identify the information which is provided to the Receiving Party.
b. Where such designation is made by stamping or similar means, it shall be made by placing notice on the document, thing, response to discovery, deposition or court transcript or record, information, or document stored on diskette or otherwise in computer usable form, or tangible thing or object, in such a manner as will not interfere with the legibility or accessibility of the Confidential Information.
c. Information and documents designated as "Confidential Information" shall be subject to the disclosure restrictions of the Order. Any Receiving Party or other person who receives a document so designated is subject to this Protective Order and the jurisdiction of the Central District of California for enforcement of the Order.
6. Inadvertent Failure to Designate
In the event that a party discovers after they have produced information that they have inadvertently failed to designate as "Confidential Information," that was not designated as Confidential, the disclosing party may designate the information as Confidential by a subsequent notice in writing identifying the information and furnishing the correct designation, in which event the parties shall henceforth treat such information as provided in the Order, and shall undertake a best effort to retrieve any disclosure, dissemination, or use of such information prior to redesignation.
7. Disclosure to Court
Confidential Information may be filed with the Court under seal only by following the requirements set forth in Local Rule 79-5.
8. Disclosure to Counsel
Pursuant to the Order, Confidential Information shall be produced only to the legal counsel of the Receiving Parties and to their experts or consultants retained in this action.
9. Disclosure to Others.
a. Any party to this proceeding and the party's representative having a need for access to the Confidential Information shall be entitled to receive all information designated hereunder as Confidential Information subject to the terms and restrictions set forth in the Order. Confidential Information may not be disclosed to any other persons or entities, including the employees and officers of a Receiving Party to this action, except under the following circumstances:
(1) Upon written permission of the Producing Party;
(2) By Order of the Court;
(3) By a disclosure to a Service Bureau who has agreed to be bound by the terms of the Order, and executed an agreement to do so.
b. Each receiving Party may provide its expert(s)/consultant(s) with Confidential Information only after such expert/consultant has been given a fully executed copy of the Order and has agreed to be bound by it by executing an agreement to do so.
c. All persons to whom Confidential Information is disclosed under Paragraph 9 other than the parties hereto and their counsel must read an executed copy of the Order, agree to be bound by it, and sign an agreement to do so.
d. Counsel for each Receiving Party shall prepare and maintain a log of all persons to whom it discloses the Confidential Information of each party and the specific Confidential Information disclosed.
10. Return of Documents
Within 90 days of either settlement or final judgment that is not appealed or subject to further legal proceedings, each Receiving Party or other person subject to the terms of the Order or in possession or control of Confidential Information shall be obligated to return to any Disclosing Party all Confidential Information, and all copies thereof.
11. Continuing Jurisdiction
This Order shall survive the final conclusion of this action.
12. Applicability of Order
The Order shall bind and apply to all persons who receive Confidential Information and who either sign an agreement to be so bound or who are given an executed copy of the Order.
Any disputes regarding the Protective Order are subject to Local Rule 37.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.