IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 21, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
JOSEPH GEORGE TKAC,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KIRK E. SHERRIFF Assistant U.S. Attorney 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93721 Telephone: (559) 497-4000 Facsimile: (559) 497-4099 Attorneys for the United States of America
ORDER CONTINUING SENTENCING ) HEARING
Old Date: Dec. 12, 2011 ) Old Time: 1:00 p.m. ) New Date: Feb.
New Time: 1:00 p.m.
Court: Four (Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill)
Defendant Joseph George Tkac pleaded guilty in this case to conspiracy to commit mail fraud and bank fraud. Sentencing is currently set for Dec. 12, 2011, at 1:00 p.m.
Mr. Tkac's plea agreement, which was filed under seal, sets forth various obligations. To allow additional time for Mr. Tkac to fulfill his obligations under the plea agreement, the parties agree that there is good cause for a continuance and hereby stipulate and jointly request that the Court order that the sentencing hearing in this case be continued from Dec. 12, 2011 to February 13, 2012, at 1:00 p.m., or the earliest date thereafter that is convenient to the Court. The parties further stipulate and jointly request that the Court extend the deadline to submit informal objections to the PreSentence Report (PSR) to three weeks prior to the continued sentencing date, and extend the deadline to file formal objections to the PSR to one week prior to the continued sentencing date.
(as authorized on 11/21/11) FRANCINE ZEPEDA PEGGY SASSO Attorneys for Defendant JOSEPH GEORGE TKAC
The court has reviewed and considered the stipulation of the parties to continue the sentencing hearing in this case. Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the sentencing hearing is continued from Dec. 12, 2011 to February 13, 2012, at 1:00 p.m., and that the deadlines to submit informal objections and to file formal objections to the Pre-Sentence Report are extended as set forth above.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.