The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Joseph C. Spero, United States District Judge
Samuel R. Miller (SBN 66871) firstname.lastname@example.org 2 Ryan M. Sandrock (SBN 251781) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 3 555 California Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 772-1200 Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 5 T. Robert Scarborough (Pro Hac Vice To Be Submitted) 6 email@example.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 7 1 South Dearborn Chicago, Illinois 60604 8 Telephone: (312) 853-7000 Facsimile: (312) 853-7036 9 Attorneys For Defendant 10 Beiersdorf, Inc. 11
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 REGARDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
WHEREAS Plaintiffs served the above-captioned lawsuit on Defendant Beiersdorf, Inc. ("Beiersdorf" or "Defendant") on November 3, 2011 (the "Complaint");
WHEREAS the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is currently November 28, 2011; 5
WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Defendant have reached an agreement, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1, 6 to extend the time within which Defendant must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to 7 January 11, 2012. 8
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the 9 undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, that Defendant will have until January 11, 10 2012 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. 11 12
Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this 25 documents has been obtained from Behram V. Parekh and Samuel R. Miller.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...