Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Michael Deeds Hammond

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 22, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL DEEDS HAMMOND,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424 Federal Defender MELODY M. WALCOTT, Bar #219930 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service 2300 Tulare Street, Suite 330 Fresno, California 93721-2226 Telephone: (559) 487-5561 Attorney for Defendant MICHAEL DEEDS HAMMOND

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE TO DECEMBER 19, 2011 AND ORDER THEREON Date: December 19, 2011 Time: 1:00 P.M.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the status conference currently scheduled for November 28, 2011 at 9:00 A.M., be continued to December 19, 2011 at 1:00P.M. This continuance is requested by both counsel because Mr. Hammond's case was transferred to this district from the District of West Virginia pursuant to Rule 20, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It is therefore anticipated the case will be resolved.

The continuance is requested for further plea negotiations and defense preparation.

The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for both counsel and the Court.

Assistant United States Attorney Laurel Montgomery does not object to this request. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for all parties and the Court.

The parties agree that time shall be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) in that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, since the failure to grant such a continuance would deny counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

ORDER

Granted. Time is hereby excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

b9ed48

20111122

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.