Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jimmy J. Mcafee, Et. Al v. Thomas Francis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


November 23, 2011

JIMMY J. MCAFEE, ET. AL.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
THOMAS FRANCIS, ET. AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

United States District Court For the Northern District of California

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT NEPTUNE'S ACCOUNT'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON ITS MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE AND MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION

On November 18, 2011, Defendant Neptune's Account, LLC ("Defendant") moved the Court for an Order Shortening Time on Defendant's Motion to Quash Service of Summons and 19 Complaint and for Dismissal of Action for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. See ECF No. 43. In 20 filing its Motions to Quash and to Dismiss, Defendant did not comply with the Court's Standing 21

Order Regarding Case Management in Civil Cases, which clearly states that civil motions under 22 Civil Local Rule 7-2 in cases assigned to the undersigned may be noticed for hearing only after 23 contacting the Courtroom Deputy, Martha Parker Brown, and obtaining an available date. 24

Accordingly, the Court moved the date of the hearing on Defendant's motions to the next available 25 date, March 1, 2012. Defendant now moves the Court to consolidate the hearing on its Motions to 26 Quash and to Dismiss with the hearings on two other motions in this case scheduled for December 27 8, 2011. 28

This case, however, is not the only matter set for hearing on December 8, 2011. Defendant,

2 like all other litigants appearing in this Court, must comply with the Court-ordered procedures laid 3 out in the Court's Standing Order, which are essential to the Court's docket management and 4 administration. The next available hearing date is March 1, 2012. The fact discovery cutoff date in 5 this case is not until June 15, 2012, and the expert discovery cutoff date is June 30, 2012, leaving 6 ample time for Defendant to engage in discovery should it not prevail on its Motions to Quash and 7 to Dismiss. The Court does not find that Defendant has demonstrated good cause for shortening 8 time on its Motions to Quash and to Dismiss, and its motion is therefore DENIED. 9

United States District Court For the Northern District of California

IT IS SO ORDERED. 10

20111123

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.