UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 28, 2011
JOE FINK, ET AL., DAYS DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Michael J. Seng United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER REVOKING PLAINTIFF'S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE $350.000 FILING FEE WITHIN THIRTY (Doc. 4)
Plaintiff Gregory McClellan ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to a Magistrate Judge handling all maters in this case. (ECF No. 6.)
Plaintiff is currently detained at Kern County Jail. On February 9, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) The Court granted this motion on February 18, 2010. (ECF No. 4.) The Court now finds that Plaintiff was granted in forma pauperis status in error.
28 U.S.C. § 1915 governs proceedings in forma pauperis. Section 1915(g) provides that "[i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action . . . under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury." A review of the actions filed by Plaintiff reveals that Plaintiff is subject to section 1915(g) and is precluded from proceeding in forma pauperis unless Plaintiff is, at the time the complaint is filed, under imminent danger of serious physical injury.*fn1
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and finds that Plaintiff does not meet the imminent danger exception. Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1053 (9th Cir. 2007). Plaintiff alleges that his rights under the Fourteenth Amended have been violated, because he is being unlawfully incarcerated due to his parole violations. The only part of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint that could imply that Plaintiff is subject to imminent danger is a single sentence, unconnected with his cause of action, in which Plaintiff alleges he suffers from "severe hypertension, anxiety, paranoia, emotional 'distress,' and fears further harassment will follow." (Am. Compl., ECF No. 8 at 7.) This does not amount to "imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time of filing." See id. at 1055 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)).
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and finds that it alleges no additional facts to support a finding that he is, at this time, under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Thus Plaintiff may not proceed in forma pauperis and must submit the appropriate filing fee in order to proceed with this action. Because the Court previously granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis status in this action, the Court revokes Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status and Plaintiff is ordered to submit the filing fee in full within thirty days.
Accordingly, based on the foregoing, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that:
1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status in this action is revoked;
2. Plaintiff is directed to submit the $350.00 filing fee in full within thirty (30) days; and
3. If Plaintiff fails to pay the $350.00 filing fee in full within thirty (30) days, this action will be dismissed, without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.