UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
November 29, 2011
IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Susan Illston, United States District Judge
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership 2 Including Professional Corporations GARY L. HALLING, Cal. Bar No. 66087 3 JAMES L. McGINNIS, Cal. Bar No. 95788 MICHAEL W. SCARBOROUGH, Cal. Bar No. 203524 4 MONA SOLOUKI, Cal. Bar No. 215145 TYLER M. CUNNINGHAM, Cal. Bar No. 243694 5 Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4106 6 Telephone: 415-434-9100 Facsimile: 415-434-3947 7 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com 8 firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com 9 firstname.lastname@example.org Attorneys for Defendants SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD. and 11 SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC.
This Document Relates to:
Target Corporation, et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., No. 3:10-cv-4945-SI
AT&T Mobility LLC, et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., No. 3:09-cv-4997-SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL
Whereas, defendant Samsung SDI Co. Ltd. ("SDI") served its First Set of Interrogatories, First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and First Set of Requests for Admission (the "Discovery") on plaintiffs Target Corporation; Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corporation; Newegg Inc.; AT&T Mobility, LLC; AT&T Corp.; AT&T Services, Inc.; BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.; Pacific Bell Telephone Company; AT&T Operations, Inc.; AT&T DataComm, Inc.; and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company ("Plaintiffs") in the above-captioned cases on October 26, 2011;
Whereas, SDI granted Plaintiffs an extension of time to respond to the Discovery to December 7, 2011;
Whereas, the current deadline to file motions to compel in the above-captioned cases is December 15, 2011, and Plaintiffs have agreed to permit SDI additional time to move to compel further responses to the Discovery.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Plaintiffs, on the one hand, and SDI, on the other hand, as follows: SDI's deadline to move to compel further responses to the Discovery shall be extended to December 23, 2011.
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.