Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bay Area Painters and Tapers v. Aic Painting Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 29, 2011

BAY AREA PAINTERS AND TAPERS PENSION TRUST FUND, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
AIC PAINTING CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION;
MARK DALE BOHN, INDIVIDUALLY AND DBA AIC PAINTING,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: The Honorable Susan Illston

Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN 124607) Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) 2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 882-7900 -- Telephone 4 (415) 882-9287 -- Facsimile mkaplan@sjlawcorp.com 5 mstafford@sjlawcorp.com 6 Attorney for Plaintiffs

Date: December 9, 2011 Time: 3:00 p.m.

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE and JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; Ctrm: 10, 19th 16 Floor

The parties herein respectfully submit their Joint Case Management Statement and joint 19 request to continue the Case Management Conference, currently on calendar for December 9, 20 2011, for approximately 30 days. 21

1. As the Court's records will reflect, a Complaint this action was filed on January 28, 2011, to compel Defendants' compliance with their obligations under the Collective Bargaining 23 Agreement to which they are signatory. 24

2. On two previous occasions, Defendants requested a payment plan to satisfy the 25 amounts due, and on each occasion, Plaintiffs drafted such agreements which Defendants 26 ultimately did not sign. 27

3. After a long hiatus in communication, Defendants' counsel recently made a settlement proposal which was reviewed by Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs provided a counter proposal and 2 are waiting for Defendants' response thereto. 3

4. There are no issues that need to be addressed at the currently scheduled Case Management Conference. In the interest of conserving costs as well as the Court's time and 5 resources, the parties respectfully request that the Case Management Conference, currently 6 scheduled for December 9, 2011, be continued for approximately 30 days to allow the parties to 7 attempt settlement with the goal of resolving this matter without the further intervention of the Court, and for the preparation, review, and execution of a Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation if an 9 agreement is reached. If an agreement is not reached and filed with the Court within that time, 10

Plaintiffs will immediately proceed with preparation and filing of a Motion for Summary 11 Judgment. 12

Respectfully submitted, 13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Based on the foregoing, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the currently set Case

Management Conference is hereby continued to _______________.

1/20/12

THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

20111129

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.