UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
December 1, 2011
PHYLLIS WEHLAGE, ON HER BEHALF AND ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
EMPRES HEALTHCARE, INC.; EHC THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN
MANAGEMENT LLC; EHC FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC; EVERGREEN CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE
LLC; EVERGREEN AT ARVIN LLC; EVERGREEN AT BAKERSFIELD LLC; EVERGREEN AT LAKEPORT
LLC; EVERGREEN AT HEARTWOOD LLC; EVERGREEN AT SPRINGS ROAD LLC; EVERGREEN AT TRACY LLC; EVERGREEN AT OROVILLE LLC; EVERGREEN AT PETALUMA LLC; EVERGREEN AT
GRIDLEY (SNF) LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 100,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Claudia Wilken
Robert J. Nelson (State Bar No. 132797) Lexi Hazam (State Bar No. 224457) 2 Andrew Kingsdale (State Bar No. 255669) LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 3 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 4 Telephone: 415.956.1000 Facsimile: 415.956.1008 5 Michael D. Thamer (State Bar No. 101440) Kathryn A. Stebner (State Bar No. 121088) 6 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D. THAMER Sarah Colby (State Bar No. 194475) Old Callahan School House STEBNER & ASSOCIATES 7 12444 South Highway 3 870 Market Street, Suite 1212 Post Office Box 1568 San Francisco, CA 94102-2907 8 Callahan, CA 96014-1568 Telephone: (415) 362-9800 Telephone: (530) 467-5307 Facsimile: (415) 362-9801 9 Facsimile: (530) 467-5437 10 [Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 12
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO DISMISS
3 leave to amend the complaint and motion to dismiss; 4
7 amended complaint; 8
9 conference; 10
11 response to Defendants' opposition to motion for leave to amend, as well as Defendants' motion 12 to dismiss, shall be December 6, 2011. 13 14
WROTEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the parties submit the following stipulation:
Whereas on November 21, 2011 Defendants filed an opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for
Whereas the Court held that Plaintiffs must file a response within seven days (Doc. #79);
Whereas November 24, 2011 is the Thanksgiving holiday;
Whereas no other scheduling modifications have been requested pertaining to Plaintiffs'
Whereas the Court has not yet set a hearing date for the motions or a case management
NOW THEREFORE, it is stipulated that deadline for Plaintiffs to file a combined
Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Laura K. Sitar. 2 3
[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.