Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Joshua Mordoff v. City of Modesto

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 6, 2011

JOSHUA MORDOFF,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF MODESTO, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

ORDER VACATING DECEMBER 12, 2011, HEARING AND TAKING MATTERS UNDER SUBMISSION

Defendants have noticed for hearing and decision a motion to dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The matter is scheduled for a hearing to be held on December 12, 2011. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), Plaintiff was required to file either an opposition or a notice of non-opposition no later than November 28, 2011. Plaintiff failed to do so. Due to Plaintiff's failure to file a timely opposition or notice of non-opposition, he is in violation of the Local Rules. See Local Rule 230(c). Plaintiff is no longer entitled to be heard at oral argument in opposition to the motion. See id. The Court has reviewed Defendants' motion and the applicable law, and has determined that the motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(h).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of December 12, 2011, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of December 12, 2011, the Court will take the matter under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20111206

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.