Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Micah Godfrey v. Tony Ross

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 6, 2011

MICAH GODFREY,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
TONY ROSS, CITY OF TULELAKE, DAN SILVA, SISKIYOU COUNTY, TRAVIS HALL, TERRY HARRIS, LAURA BELLASALMA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIN MARTIN AND ROSS MARKET, DEFENDANTS.

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER

After reviewing the parties' Joint Status Report, the court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for December 12, 2011.

I. SERVICE OF PROCESS

Plaintiff shall effect service upon any unserved defendant within thirty days of the file-stamped date of this order. The failure to do so may result in the dismissal of the action as against the then-unserved defendants. Service upon Dan Silva shall be conducted within thirty days of his return from military leave.

Except as so provided, no further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b).

II. JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS

Within thirty days of the file-stamped date of this order, plaintiffs may amend their complaint to include the true identity of "Erin Martin." Defendants shall respond to the amended complaint within 20 days of service thereof.

Except as so provided, no further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted except with leave of court, good cause having been shown under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).

III. JURISDICTION/VENUE

Jurisdiction is predicated upon federal question jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, jurisdiction pursuant to federal civil rights claims, 28 U.S.C. § 1343, and supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367. Venue is undisputed and is hereby found to be proper.

IV. DISCOVERY

The parties shall serve the initial disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) by no later than January 23, 2012.

The parties have agreed to complete non-expert discovery by no later than December 12, 2012. Plaintiff shall disclose experts and produce reports in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by no later than January 2, 2013. Defendants shall disclose experts and produce reports in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by no later than February 4, 2013. With regard to expert testimony intended solely for rebuttal, those experts shall be disclosed and reports produced in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on or before March 4, 2013.

All discovery, including depositions for preservation of testimony, is left open, save and except that it shall be so conducted as to be completed by April 15, 2013. The word "completed" means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relevant to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge's calendar in accordance with the local rules of this court and so that such motions may be heard (and any resulting orders obeyed) not later than April 15, 2013.

V. MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE

All motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders, or other emergency applications, shall be filed on or before June 10, 2013. All motions shall be noticed for the next available hearing date. Counsel are cautioned to refer to the local rules regarding the requirements for noticing and opposing such motions on the court's regularly scheduled law and motion calendar.

VI. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

The Final Pretrial Conference is set for August 19, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom No. 5. The conference shall be attended by at least one of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties and by any unrepresented parties.

Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Pretrial Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of witnesses for oral testimony. Counsel shall file separate pretrial statements, and are referred to Local Rules 281 and 282 relating to the contents of and time for filing those statements. In addition to those subjects listed in Local Rule 281(b), the parties are to provide the court with: (1) a plain, concise statement which identifies every non-discovery motion which has been made to the court, and its resolution; (2) a list of the remaining claims as against each defendant; and (3) the estimated number of trial days.

In providing the plain, concise statements of undisputed facts and disputed factual issues contemplated by Local Rule 281(b)(3)-(4), the parties shall emphasize the claims that remain at issue, and any remaining affirmatively pled defenses thereto. If the case is to be tried to a jury, the parties shall also prepare a succinct statement of the case, which is appropriate for the court to read to the jury.

VII. TRIAL SETTING

The jury trial is set for October 22, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff requests a jury trial and estimates that the trial will last ten court days. Defendant Siskiyou County estimates a jury trial will last six days. The United States claims that plaintiff is not entitled to a jury trial on the claims brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2402.

VIII. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

A Settlement Conference will be set at the time of the Pretrial Conference. All parties should be prepared to advise the court whether they will stipulate to the trial judge acting as settlement judge and waive disqualification by virtue thereof.

Counsel are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at the Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. At least seven calendar days before the Settlement Conference counsel for each party shall submit a confidential Settlement Conference Statement for review by the settlement judge. If the settlement judge is not the trial judge, the Settlement Conference Statements shall not be filed and will not otherwise be disclosed to the trial judge.

IX. MODIFICATIONS TO SCHEDULING ORDER

Any requests to modify the dates or terms of this Scheduling Order, except requests to change the date of the trial, may be heard and decided by the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to change the trial date shall be heard and decided only by the undersigned judge.

20111206

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.