The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Dale S. Fischer, United States District Judge
Present: The Honorable DALE S. FISCHER, United States District Judge
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of
Subject Matter Jurisdiction
"Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction" and "possess only that power authorized by [the] Constitution and statute . . . ." Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). The party asserting federal jurisdiction has the burden to prove that jurisdiction exists. Lewis v. Verizon Commc'ns, Inc., 627 F.3d 395, 399 (9th Cir. 2010).
Plaintiff claims that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, otherwise known as diversity jurisdiction. (Compl. ¶ 1.) Federal courts have diversity jurisdiction over civil actions in which: (1) the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000; and (2) there is complete diversity of citizenship between the opposing parties.
28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Although Plaintiff alleges that the amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional amount, (Compl. ¶ 1), Plaintiff fails to establish complete diversity.
Plaintiff, an individual, fails to allege her own citizenship. An individual is a citizen of the state where he or she is domiciled. Kanter v. Warner-Lambert Co., 265
F.3d 853, 857 (9th Cir. 2001). Domicile requires residency with the intent to remain. Id. Plaintiff alleges only that he is "an individual, and resident of Los Angeles County, California." (Compl. ¶ 3.) Thus, Plaintiff's citizenship cannot be determined.
Plaintiff also fails to allege the citizenship of Defendants Stephen A. Wynn and Barbara Conway. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Wynn, an individual, is a Nevada resident, (id. ¶ 7), and that Defendant ...