Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Robin Dasenbrock v. Kings County

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 8, 2011

ROBIN DASENBROCK,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
KINGS COUNTY, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge

PAYMENTS FOR THIS ACTION(Doc. 5.)

ORDER DISMISSING THIS CASE AS DUPLICATIVE OF CASE 1:11-CV-01884-DLB-PC (Doc. 1.)

ORDER VACATING ORDER DIRECTING CDCR TO COLLECT FILING FEE

ORDER FOR CLERK TO ENTER THIS ORDER ON THE DOCKET FOR CASE 1:11-CV-01884-DLB-PC

Robin Dasenbrock ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was commenced by civil complaint on November 17, 2011. (Doc. 1.) On November 22, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis and entered an order directing the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ("CDCR") to deduct payment from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350.00 filing fee for this action. (Doc. 5.)

On December 2, 2011, Plaintiff consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction in this action, and no other parties have made an appearance. (Doc. 7.) Therefore, pursuant to Appendix A(k)(4) of the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, the undersigned shall conduct any and all proceedings in the case until such time as reassignment to a District Judge is required. Local Rule Appendix A(k)(3).

On December 2, 2011, Plaintiff notified the Court that the complaint for this action is duplicative of the complaint in case 1:11-cv--01884-DLB-PC. (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff asserts that he submitted two copies of the same complaint to the Court, in separate envelopes, and the Court opened two separate cases and assigned two case numbers for the same action. Plaintiff requests that this error be resolved before he is subject to orders requiring him to pay two $350.00 filing fees.

A review of the complaints filed in Plaintiff's two actions reveals that the two complaints are identical, except that the exhibits to the complaints are arranged in different page order and vary by one page.*fn1 Good cause appearing, the present action, 1:11-cv-01917-GSA-PC, shall be dismissed as duplicative, and Plaintiff shall proceed with case 1:11-cv--01884-DLB-PC. In addition, the Court shall vacate its order directing the CDCR to deduct the filing fee for this case, 1:11-cv-01917-GSAPC, from Plaintiff's prison trust account.

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is DISMISSED as duplicative of case 1:11-cv--01884-DLB-PC;

2. The Court's order of November 15, 2011 in this case, 1:11-cv-01917-GSA-PC, which directed the CDCR to make payments to the Court from Plaintiff's prison trust account for payment of the filing fee for this case, 1:11-cv-01917-GSA-PC, is VACATED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to:

(1) CLOSE this case;

(2) ENTER this order on the docket for case 1:11-cv--01884-DLB-PC;

(3) SERVE a copy of this order on:

(i) the Director of the CDCR; and

(ii) the Financial Department, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6i0kij


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.