Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bernadette Irigoyen, Personally and On Behalf v. First Guaranty Financial Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 8, 2011

BERNADETTE IRIGOYEN, PERSONALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SIMILARLY SITUATED,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
FIRST GUARANTY FINANCIAL CORPORATION, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

ORDER CLOSING CASE

This case involves the attempted foreclosure by Defendants against real property owned by Plaintiff. On October 11, 2011, Plaintiff filed a notice of Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

On October 20, 2011, after the Court received briefing regarding Plaintiff's standing and the effect of her bankruptcy on this case, the Court denied all pending motions because Plaintiff lost her standing because the bankruptcy trustee became the real party in interest. Instead of dismissing the case at that time, the Court gave Plaintiff two options to be followed by November 18, 2011 -- either file a notice of the bankruptcy trustee's ratification, joinder, or substitution pursuant to Rule 17(a)(3), or file an amended complaint that alleges, consistent with Rule 11, that the causes of action alleged in this lawsuit are exempt from the bankruptcy estate or that the bankruptcy trustee has abandoned the causes of action alleged in this lawsuit. See Doc. No. 26. Importantly, the Court also stated: "The failure to abide by the time limitations in this order will result in the dismissal of the entire action without further notice." Id.

As of the date of the signing of this order, there have been no further filings by any party.*fn1

That is, Plaintiff has not followed the Court's October 20, 2011, order.

The Court takes Plaintiff's failure to comply with the October 20 order, and the failure to heed the warning regarding termination of the case, as Plaintiff's decision to discontinue prosecution of this matter. The Plaintiff's failure to file either an amended complaint or involve the trustee prevents this case from proceeding because, as Plaintiff herself conceded, Plaintiff has no standing. Therefore, it is appropriate to close this case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, due to Plaintiff's failure to follow the options set forth in the October 20, 2011 order, the Complaint is hereby DISMISSED due to Plaintiff's lack of standing, and the Clerk shall CLOSE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.