The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Garland E. Burrell, Jr.
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender MATTHEW C. BOCKMON, Bar # 161566 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service 801 I Street, 3rd Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 498-5700 Attorney for Defendant MARCOS SURITA
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND TO EXCLUDE TIME Date: January 27, 2012 Time: 9:00 a.m.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, William S. Wong, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Matthew C. Bockmon, Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for Defendant, MARCOS SURITA, that the status conference hearing date of Friday, December 9, 2011, be vacated and a new status conference hearing date of Friday, January 27, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.,be set.
The reason for this continuance is because the parties have conferred and agree that additional time is needed for defense preparation and meetings between the parties with the goal being to resolve the case by way of a disposition.
It is further stipulated that the time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of the signing of this order, through and including January 27, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4, and that the ends of justice to be served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant to a speedy trial. Dated: December 8, 2011
ORDER Based on the reasons set forth in the stipulation of the parties filed on December 8, 2011, and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDEREDthat the status conference currently scheduled for Friday, December 9, 2011, be vacated and that the case be set for Friday, January 27, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded during the time period of today's date, through and including January 27, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, due to the need to provide defense counsel with the reasonable time to prepare taking into account due diligence.
United States District Judge
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...