Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Tria Beauty, Inc v. Oregon Aesthetic Technologies
December 12, 2011
TRIA BEAUTY, INC.,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
OREGON AESTHETIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: District Judge William H. Alsup
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP RALPH A. ZAPPALA, SB# 102052 2 E-Mail: zappala@lbbslaw.com One Sansome Street, Suite 1400 3 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: 415.362.2580 4 Facsimile: 415.434.0882 5 Attorneys for Defendant OREGON AESTHETIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 6 7 ROPES & GRAY LLP Peter M. Brody (Pro Hac Vice) 8 E-mail: Peter.Brody@ropesgray.com 700 12th Street, N.W., Suite900 9 Washington, DC 20005-3948 Tel: (202) 508-4612 10 Fax: (202) 383-7777 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff TRIA BEAUTY, INC. 12 13
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO TRANSFER THE ACTION Trial Date: None Set
Plaintiff TRIA BEAUTY, INC. ("TRIA") and Defendant OREGON AESTHETIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ("OAT") stipulate and agree to the transfer of this action to the 25 United States District Court, District of Oregon, Portland Division, Case No. 10-cv-1362-26 JE. 27 28
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER
I, Ralph A. Zappala, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 15 obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the 16 laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. 17
By: District Judge William H. Alsup
4835-4761-2942.1 2 C-10-05053-WHA
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...