UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
December 12, 2011
IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
ELECTROGRAPH SYSTEMS, INC.; ELECTROGRAPH TECHNOLOGIES CORP.,
EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Susan Y. Illston United States District Judge
William A. Isaacson (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20015 Telephone: (202) 237-2727 Facsimile: (202) 237-6131 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Philip J. Iovieno (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor Albany, NY 12207 Telephone: (518) 434-0600 Facsimile: (518) 434-0665 Email: email@example.com Counsel for Plaintiffs ELECTROGRAPH SYSTEMS, INC. and ELECTROGRAPH TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
[Additional counsel listed on signature page]
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MITSUI & CO. (TAIWAN), LTD.'S MOTION TO DISMISS ELECTROGRAPH SYSTEMS, INC.'S AND ELECTROGRAPHTECHNOLOGIES CORP.'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI (N.D. Cal.)
This Document Relates To Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-00117-SI (N.D. Cal.) MDL No. 1827
and Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd. ("Mitsui Taiwan"), through their undersigned counsel, 3 respectfully request that the Court enter the following order to (1) extend Plaintiffs' time to oppose Defendant's Motion to Dismiss to December 30, 2011; and (2) extend Mitsui Taiwan's time to file 5 a reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss to January 20, 2012. 6
WHEREAS, on October 4, 2011, Plaintiffs and Mitsui Taiwan entered into a stipulation 7 giving Mitsui Taiwan until December 1, 2011, to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' 8 complaint; 9 10 action on December 1, 2011 (MDL Dkt #4243) (the "Motion");
its opposition to the Motion; 14 to submit its reply to such opposition. 16 17 undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 18
Plaintiffs Electrograph Systems, Inc. and Electrograph Technologies, Corp. ("Plaintiffs")
WHEREAS Mitsui Taiwan filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint in this
WHEREAS Defendant noticed the Motion to be heard on February 3, 2012;
WHEREAS the parties now agree that Plaintiffs may have until December 30, 2011, to file
WHEREAS the parties now further agree that Defendant may have until January 20, 2012,
THEREFORE, Plaintiffs, by their undersigned counsel, and Mitsui Taiwan, by its
1. Plaintiffs shall oppose the Motion by December 30, 2011.
2. Defendant shall submit its reply by January 20, 2012.
3. The Motion shall be heard on February 3, 2012.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
this document has been obtained from stipulating defendants. Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.