The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Susan Y. Illston United States District Judge
William A. Isaacson (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20015 Telephone: (202) 237-2727 Facsimile: (202) 237-6131 Email: email@example.com Philip J. Iovieno (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor Albany, NY 12207 Telephone: (518) 434-0600 Facsimile: (518) 434-0665 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Counsel for Plaintiffs ELECTROGRAPH SYSTEMS, INC. and ELECTROGRAPH TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
[Additional counsel listed on signature page]
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MITSUI & CO. (TAIWAN), LTD.'S MOTION TO DISMISS ELECTROGRAPH SYSTEMS, INC.'S AND ELECTROGRAPHTECHNOLOGIES CORP.'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI (N.D. Cal.)
This Document Relates To Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-00117-SI (N.D. Cal.) MDL No. 1827
and Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd. ("Mitsui Taiwan"), through their undersigned counsel, 3 respectfully request that the Court enter the following order to (1) extend Plaintiffs' time to oppose Defendant's Motion to Dismiss to December 30, 2011; and (2) extend Mitsui Taiwan's time to file 5 a reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss to January 20, 2012. 6
WHEREAS, on October 4, 2011, Plaintiffs and Mitsui Taiwan entered into a stipulation 7 giving Mitsui Taiwan until December 1, 2011, to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' 8 complaint; 9 10 action on December 1, 2011 (MDL Dkt #4243) (the "Motion");
its opposition to the Motion; 14 to submit its reply to such opposition. 16 17 undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 18
Plaintiffs Electrograph Systems, Inc. and Electrograph Technologies, Corp. ("Plaintiffs")
WHEREAS Mitsui Taiwan filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint in this
WHEREAS Defendant noticed the Motion to be heard on February 3, 2012;
WHEREAS the parties now agree that Plaintiffs may have until December 30, 2011, to file
WHEREAS the parties now further agree that Defendant may have ...