Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Sibyl Rena Alexander v. Department of the Army

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 12, 2011

SIBYL RENA ALEXANDER
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Gary Allen Feess

LINK: 3

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable GARY ALLEN FEESS

Renee Fisher None N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None None

Proceedings: (In Chambers)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff Sibyl Rena Alexander's Complaint, filed on October 17, 2011, against Defendant Department of the Army. (Docket No. 3.) Because Plaintiff seeks more than $25,000,000 for denial of survival pension benefits worth $200,000, in reliance on an allegedly fraudulent divorce document in Plaintiff's late husband's service file, the Complaint appears to assert a tort claim against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671--2680. (See Compl. at 3--4, 7.) However, Plaintiff has named as Defendant a federal agency, Department of the Army, rather than the United States, in contravention of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671, and 2679. See Lomax v. United States, 155 F. Supp. 354, 356 (D.C. Pa. 1957) (". . . [A] suit arising under the Tort Claims Act must be brought against the United States of America and cannot be brought against the federal agency allegedly responsible for the tort."). In addition, Plaintiff has not adequately alleged that she has exhausted administrative remedies, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2675.

Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE no later than Tuesday, December 27, 2011, why the Court should not dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to respond by this deadline will be deemed consent to dismissal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20111212

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.