UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 12, 2011
CERTAIN CLAIMS DIRECTOR OF CDCR, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
Plaintiff Rudy Minjarez ("Plaintiff") is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his second amended complaint on June 7, 2011. Doc. 11. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On November 1, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objection to the Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. Doc. 14. Plaintiff did not object to the Findings and Recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 1, 2011, is adopted in full;
2. This action proceeds Defendants Cortez, Swetalla, Gaona, Fidler,
and Barajas on the
excessive force claim, and against Defendant John Doe 2*fn1
on the conditions of confinement claim; and
3. Plaintiff's claim for supervisory liability against Defendants John Doe 1 and Gonzales, and his claim for conspiracy against Defendants Cortez, Swetalla, Gaona, Fidler, and Barajas are DISMISSED from this action for failure to state a claim.
IT IS SO ORDERED.