Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Sharon Randall, As Guardian Ad Litem For Jamar Bryant, A Minor, and, Sharon Randall v. City of Oakland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 16, 2011

SHARON RANDALL, AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR JAMAR BRYANT, A MINOR, AND, SHARON RANDALL, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CITY OF OAKLAND, A MUNICIPAL ORPORATION; HOWARD JORDAN, IN HIS CAPACITY AS ACTING CHIEF OF POLICE FOR CITY OF OAKLAND; AND, DOES 1-25, INCLUSIVE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND IN THEIR CAPACITY AS POLICE OFFICERS FOR CITY OF OAKLAND, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley United States District Court Magistrate Judge

JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar # 69888 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, CA 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 E-Mail: john.burris@johnburrislaw.com GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq./ State Bar # 109173 LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET 486 41st Street, # 3 Oakland, CA 94609 Telephone and Facsimile: (510) 420-0324 E-Mail: glibet@sbcglobal.net Attorneys for Plaintiffs James F. Hodgkins. Esq./ State Bar # 142561 Supervising Trial Attorney Oakland City Attorney's Office One Frank Ogawa Plaza, Sixth Floor Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 238-6135 Facsimile: (510) 238-6500 E-Mail: Jhodgkins@oaklandcityattorney.org

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

STIPULATION

All parties to this action stipulate and agree, by and through their respective counsel, as follows:

1. The parties have not yet conducted any discovery;

2. It is necessary for plaintiff's counsel to file a Stipulation and Order for Leave to File First Amended Complaint and First Amended Complaint in order to substitute the names of defendant officers for DOE defendants. Although plaintiffs' counsel still does not have more clear information or documents regarding who was present at the subject incident; which OPD officers were actually involved in the subject incident; what OPD officers allege occurred; any plaintiff, OPD officers, or witness information or statements that were taken by OPD; and/or any photographs that were taken of the scene or persons at the scene by OPD, defense counsel has produced the names of the OPD officers who were involved;

3. The parties cannot conduct a meaningful Settlement Conference at this time for the above-stated reasons;

5. Therefore, good cause appearing, and counsel have conferred and agreed, the parties request that this Court continue the Settlement Conference presently scheduled for December 20, 2011 to a date approximately sixty (60) days from that date;

Respectfully submitted,

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a conformed signature, indicated as "/s/ " within this E-filed document.

Dated: By:

GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The settlement conference shall be completed by February 21, 2012.

20111216

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.