UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
December 19, 2011
CITY OF SUMMERSIDE, PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND, CANADA, PLAINTIFF,
KATRINA BERG SUSSMEIER, FRANK DILEO, MARK LAMICA, QUINCY KRASHNA, AS INDIVIDUALS, STARLINK PRODUCTIONS, LLC, STARLINK PRODUCTIONS, INC.; DLM MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.; DILEO ENTERTAINMENT & TOURING INC.; DILEO ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; DILEO LAMICA MANAGEMENT GROUP; DLM GROUP DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Edward J. Davila
KENDALL BRILL & KLIEGER LLP T T Bert H. Deixler (70614) N I 2 firstname.lastname@example.org AS MODIFIED I Nicholas F Daum (236155) U A 3 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 1725 N Los Angeles, California 90067 N d . Davila R Telephone: 310.556.2700 R Judge E Facsimile: I O dwar J O 4 310.556.2705 T L F 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff City of Summerside
IT IS SO ORDERED
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HEARING SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 6, 2012
Crtrm.: 1 EJD
Trial Date: Not set
Plaintiff City of Summerside ("Summerside"), on the one hand, and 2 Defendants Katrina Berg Sussmeier, StarLink Productions LLC, and StarLink 3 Productions, Inc. (the "Sussmeier Defendants") on the other, through their 4 respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and request entry of an order of the 5 Court as follows:
WHEREAS, a hearing in this matter is currently scheduled for January 6, 7 2012 ;
WHEREAS, Summerside and the Sussmeier Defendants are negotiating and 9 are in the process of finalizing a mutual settlement agreement that resolves, as 10 between the Parties, the above-captioned lawsuit;
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to complete their settlement negotiations, and 12 currently anticipate providing the Court with a final settlement agreement and order 13 confirming that agreement shortly;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. The motion by the Sussmeier Defendants scheduled for January 6, 2012 (Docket No. 33) shall be taken off calendar.
1. The Sussmeier Defendants' motion scheduled for January 6, 2012 (Docket No. 33) shall be taken off calendar. Based on the stipulated representations, the clerk shall terminate Docket Item Nos. 10 and 33. Defendant Dileo's Motion to Dismiss (Docket Item No. 36) and Plaintiff's Motion to Substitute (Docket Item No. 55) remain on calendar for January 6, 2012, unless the court is notified otherwise. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Hon. Edward J. Davila Judge, United States District Court
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.