IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 19, 2011
JACLYN CORNELIA WILHITE,
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, ET AL.,
ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS
Currently pending before the Court are multiple motions to dismiss by Defendants. Hearing on these motions was set for December 12, 2011, but that hearing was vacated due to Plaintiff's failure to follow the local rules. Specifically, Plaintiff failed to file a timely opposition or notice of non-opposition. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se. *fn1 On December 12, 2011, Plaintiff filed numerous documents. Several of the documents are in the nature of an opposition to the motions to dismiss, though not necessarily entitled oppositions. These filings were docketed on December 15, 2011.
The Court will consider those documents that may be construed as an opposition to the motions to dismiss. However, because these documents were not timely filed, Defendants have not been given the opportunity to file reply memorandum. The Court will make provision for Defendants to file reply briefs.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. No later than January 4, 2012, Defendants shall file reply memorandum in support of their motions to dismiss;
2. Defendants' reply memorandum shall address Document Numbers 25, 28, 30, and 33 *fn2 as they may relate to the motion to dismiss; and
3. The matters remain under submission.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE