Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Marie Cusick v. Kohl's Department Stores

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 22, 2011

MARIE CUSICK
v.
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Dale S. Fischer, United States District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable DALE S. FISCHER, United States District Judge

Debra Plato Pamela Batalo Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not present Not present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE REMAND TO STATE COURT

On December 14, 2011, Defendant removed this action from state court, claiming subject matter jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332, otherwise known as diversity jurisdiction. Removal must take place within 30 days after the receipt of a removable pleading. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(1). Defendant's agent for service of process was served on October 19, 2011. (Notice of Removal ¶ 2; Holly Decl. ¶ 3.) It appears that Defendant's December 14 removal was untimely, and Defendant does not contend otherwise in its Notice of Removal.

Defendant is ordered to show cause in writing by January 3, 2012 why this case should not be remanded for untimely removal. If Plaintiff objects to removal, she must file a notice of the objection within 30 days of the notice of removal being filed. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20111222

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.