Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Padilla v. Livermore Police Dept.

December 23, 2011

PADILLA
v.
LIVERMORE POLICE DEPT., ET AL.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: District Judge Edward M. Chen

CIVIL MINUTES

Time: 4:05 p.m.

Case No. and Name:

Attorneys: No appearance

Deputy Clerk: Betty Lee

PROCEEDINGS:

- Plaintiff's application for TRO is denied. The parties against who the TRO is sought are not named as defendants in the complaint. Neither these parties nor the named defendants have been served or notified of the application. The complaint and brief in support of the application do not establish the showing necessary for a TRO. The case remains with Magistrate Judge Laporte to determine IFP status and further proceedings.

cc: Plaintiff (hand delivered)

20111223

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.