The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Susan Illston
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL
This Document Relates To:
APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT OF ALL DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ACTIONS DEFENDANTS CHI MEI INNOLUX CORPORATION; CHI MEI CORPORATION; CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION; CMO JAPAN CO., LTD.; CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC.; NEXGEN MEDIATECH, INC.; AND NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC.
Date: December 19, 2011 Time: 4:00 p.m. Courtroom: 10, 19th Floor
Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei 4 (collectively, "Chi Mei") set forth in the Settlement Agreement ("Agreement"), dated July 15,
This matter has come before the Court to determine whether there is any cause why this Court should not approve the settlement with defendants Chimei Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei 3 Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., and Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc. 5
2011, relating to the above-captioned litigation. The Court, after carefully considering all papers 7 filed and proceedings held herein and otherwise being fully informed in the premises, has 8 determined (1) that the settlement should be approved, and (2) that there is no just reason for 9 delay of the entry of this final judgment approving the Agreement. Accordingly, the Court directs 10 entry of Judgment which shall constitute a final adjudication of this case on the merits as to the 11 parties to the Agreement. Good cause appearing therefore, it is: 12
within this litigation and over the parties to the Agreement, including all members of the Class 15 and Chi Mei. 16 17 though fully set forth in this Judgment.
Class pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 21 22 appointed by the Court (Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP and Pearson, Simon, 23 Warshaw & Penny, LLP), are appointed as Counsel for the Class. These firms have, and will, 24 fairly and competently represent the interests of the Class.
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:
1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this litigation, and all actions
2. The definitions of terms set forth in the Agreement are incorporated hereby as
3. The Court hereby finally approves and confirms the settlement set forth in the Agreement and finds that said settlement is, in all respects, ...