Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lionel James v. Michael J. Astrue

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


December 29, 2011

LIONEL JAMES,
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Richard Seeborg United States District Judge

*E-Filed 12/29/11*

ORDER

On December 28, 2011, petitioner Lionel James responded in writing to the Order to Show Cause (OSC) (Dkt. No. 23), indicating that he intends to pursue his case and is willing to appear on 18 January 5, 2012 to demonstrate his interest in the case. Good cause appearing, the OSC and the 19 hearing noticed for 1:30 p.m. on January 5, 2012 is hereby vacated. 20 However, as the OSC noted, James neglected to file a motion for summary judgment or remand by July 22, 2011, as required by the Court's standing procedural order for social security 22 review cases (Dkt. No. 3). James is therefore instructed that he must file a motion for summary 23 judgment or remand by January 28, 2012 (30 days from the date of this order). If he does not, this 24 case may be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20111229

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.